Free Will And Determinism A Clockwork Orange - 901 Words

A Clockwork Orange demonstrates the philosophically issues of free will and determinism through how the main character was treated in the movie. It also addresses important issues such as ethics, philosophy of the mind, free will and determinism, and the problem of perception. Philosophers such as John Hospers, B.F. Skinner, and Jean-Paul Sartre have different views on the issue through their theories of how individuals are or are not responsible for the free will choices that they make in life. The main character in the movie was a very violent , and reckless person. He participated in sinful acts such as being a gang member, raping women, being involved in fights, etc. These actions resulted in him being sent to prison and eventually being brainwashed into doing things out of his character. The three philosophers have very different interpretations of how the main character should have been dealt with and the reasonings behind his actions. The philosopher John Hospers’ views on free will and determination go completely against the movie A Clockwork Orange. Hospers claims that our actions are â€Å"compelled† and we do not make our own free choices, but it happens unconsciously . In A Clockwork Orange the main character, Alex, has his free will taking away from him through a series of extreme and harsh experimental tactics in the dystopia that he is apart of. The government believes that the can control the thoughts and actions of their citizens and just change them.Show MoreRelatedFree Will vs Determinism in A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess1208 Words   |  5 PagesIn Anthony Burgess’ 1962 dystopian novella, A Clockwork Orange, teenage gangs and hoodlums run rampid in a futuristic society, inflicting mayhem and brutality among its totalitarian governed state. Alex, our protagonist/anti-hero, is among the most infamous in this violent youth culture. A psychotic, yet devilishly intelligent bo y of fifteen, our â€Å"humble narrator† beats up on old folk, rapes underaged girls, pillages, and leads his group of â€Å"droogs† (friends) on a chaotic path of â€Å"ultra-violenceRead More freeclo Comapring Free Will in A Clockwork Orange and Freedom and the Control of Man2484 Words   |  10 PagesFree Will in A Clockwork Orange and Skinners Freedom and the Control of Man      Ã‚   Socrates once said, Know thyself, and over two thousand years later were still perplexed with the complexities of human behavior. The concept of free will has been debated and challenged by science, religion, and philosophy throughout history. By free will, I mean our ability to choose and behave as we wish, without our choices being determined by outside sources. Such a notion has been discussed and disputedRead MoreHow Plato Creates A New Argument Within The Human Of Egoism And The Guardians956 Words   |  4 Pagesdo not want unfocused, beings in the group. Their free wills are not required to be overthrown. Using psychological determinism, the mental state can be defined as psychological. Determinism says that all of our wants are uniquely caused by nature and nurture. The laws of association occurs before the kids have any control. These laws say that everything we do is not freely chosen but are connected to the childhood. This suggests that no one has free wants, but the Guardians, like us, they were conditionedRead MoreThe Misuse of Power and the Extent of Free Will Within A Clockwork Orange and Nineteen Eighty-Four1980 Words   |  8 PagesIn both Nineteen Eighty-four and A Clockwork Orange, free will and the misuse of power are two intrinsically linked themes which are woven throughout and that govern everything that happens within both novels. The different reactions of different characters are an area that both George Orwell and Anthony Burgess focus on with interesting parallels between the two main protagonists, Alex and Winston. Winston and Alex, although very different, react in quite a similar fashion to events surroundingRead MoreEssay on Analysis of George Orwells 19844218 Words   |  17 Pagesemployed by Anthony Burgess in A Clockwork Orange. The basis of this therapy was to control the thoughts of the patient and to force conformity to the standards set by society. Room 101 employs similar tactics in forcing Winstons conformity. The end result is similar, a tragic suppression of individuality by denying freedom of thought, the creation of a conformist and the destruction of the individual. The issue of Newspeak is also relevant to issues of free thought and identity. In 1984, the

Analysis Of The Poem Raffaello Sanzio Da Urbino

Intro Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino, more commonly known as Raphael, was an admirable and innovative artist that lived during the High Renaissance period. He was a painter, an architect, and a poet, and his creativity left a lasting impact in the world of art. His painting in particular was highly regarded; some considered Raphael to be the incarnation of painting itself and others said he was the greatest painter of the western world. Even those who had a low opinion of Raphael gave him credit for his greatness. His final painting, The Transfiguration, demonstrates the epitome of his renowned techniques, harmonious color choices, ease of composition, and clarity of form in a wonderful piece from the Italian Renaissance. Historical Context†¦show more content†¦Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci, two other prominent artists of the Renaissance, worked during the same time period as Raphael as well. Painting at the same time as them likely had a positive effect on Raphael’s work as they strove to push their creative and innovative limits. Raphael is now regarded as one of the trinity of art masters alongside Michelangelo and da Vinci, and even among them he stands out. â€Å"He differed from Leonardo and from Michelangelo only in his serene faith that he could go forward without destroying or losing himself - this was the Renaissance faith in the virtus of man.† At the age of twenty-one, Raphael moved to Florence. This decision is thought to have been a catalyst for his stylistic development. One of his first commissions was from Pope Julius II, who asked Raphael to decorate his apartments at the vatican. As aforementioned, he went on to do architectural work, write poetry, paint frescoes and portraits, and draw, eventually settling on painting as his primary focus. Raphael was a follower of classicism. In fact, it was stated that â€Å"Raphael [gave] form to the academic version of classicism† during the High Renaissance. He was known for focusing on figure and space, along with having a dramatic expression. Two words that are often mentioned when discussing Raphael’s style are â€Å"harmony† and

Spelling by Margaret Atwood free essay sample

Chen Mrs. Mekhala MYP Year 5 Language Arts April 3, 2013 Poem Analysis on â€Å"Spelling† Margaret Atwood’s Spelling is a sophisticated and emotional poem. Like much of Atwood’s poetry, it has one central objective deeply rooted in her feminist beliefs. She aims firstly at the women in history by expressing the horrors of the low social status of women and how they were tortured in war; then she explains that education is what gives women the power to stand up for themselves and fight for freedom and convinces more people to start receiving education. She denies the ideas of â€Å"housewives† and â€Å"daughters† and explains it is what keeps the female gender weak throughout history. Atwood convinces the readers to abduct this old view of females and understand the importance of education. She does this through appalling sensual images, attitude shifts and connotations to the reader and describes a volcano eruption with clear sensory language, making this poem one of the most powerful poem in history. The shocking impression Atwood uses to portray the tormented women in history is given more strength by the remarkable range of poetic devices and sensual languages she uses, including metaphor, choice of diction and sensual appeals. These devices add power to the poem and its effect on the reader by producing and emphasizing the impression Atwood wanted: of a female in history burnt in the stalks with leather stuffed in her mouth because of wizardry, or a female prisoner of war tortured and killed with no ability to speak or fight for herself. Atwood collaborates a wide range of words to express her impression on feminist ideas. She opens with her daughter trying to learn how to spell. This child is most likely going to receive education, but she is too young and does not realize that. The poet then mentions â€Å"red, blue and hard yellow,† these are primary colors, which are colors that can recombine to any color that exists. Just as a few simple letters could also reintegrate to form all the words in English. Then, the poet mentions her daughter is learning â€Å"how to make spells. The word â€Å"Spells† used here mean words but also has a connotation of magic and sorcery. It represents her daughter’s imagination, combining letters together like experimenting or an adventure. In the next stanza, â€Å"daughters† has a different meaning from the most common known definition. Instead of meaning a girl in relation to her parents, it represents the common figure of a women at that time period, which is a housewife. â€Å"Mainline† is word often used for drug addicts when injecting drugs, this word symbolizes lust and hunger. It can strongly express the feeling of a woman who wants to receive education in a time period of sexism and prejudice. When the â€Å"ancestress† was burnt to death, the poet did not mean her ancestress, but all the females in history treated cruelly. This technique made this extremely easy to visualize, bringing the reader back in time to the darkest ages in history for women. This shocks the reader and subverts masculism and sexist ideologies applied by masculist writers. Atwood also applies metaphor in this poem. The poet takes us to a scene of a volcano eruption. In Atwood’s language, we feel the sophisticated dread and the strength of nature impact on our hearts. It describes how it feels when one cannot express her feelings with words, the language is so poor that it â€Å"falls away from hot bones, at the point were the rock breaks open and darkness flows out of it like blood, at the melting point of granite† This description can refer to the ancestress in the last stanza, burnt with her mouth sealed with leather. The word â€Å"witch† means they were performing wizardry, or something against social norms, which is the reason they are killed. This â€Å"witch† is compared to the poet’s daughter in the first stanza, experimenting with education. Atwood uses this to represent the women who tried to express their ideas, but were forced to be silenced forever. Although human bones, the strongest structure of the body, cannot withstand fire, it is still not the end. Just as it is not the end of a stone when it is melt to magma. After the suffering of high temperature, the stone will become more solid and tough. Just like human, without going through pain and confronting their weaknesses, there is no meaning or power. Atwood emphasizes her final point in this stanza: One must confront their weaknesses in order to let the body itself able to speak. The final main approach Atwood uses is the comparison of attitudes between the last and first stanza. It brings the reader back to the word learning process, but not with toys. â€Å"How do you learn to spell? † The answer is not longer plastic letters, or letters. but â€Å"Blood, sky the sun,† The blood that flows in women nature, the part of sky that women should have and the sun to shine on everyone. Learning to spell is not a game or adventure anymore, but the gain of education and power. This stanza is strongly supported by the phrase Atwood used in the previous stanzas â€Å"A word after a word after a word is power. † This phrase is powerful and leaves the reader realizing the true power of knowing to speak. Spelling is a poem of many layers and approaches but only one main objective, all rooted in the poet’s feminist beliefs. She uses strong sensual images created by metaphors, connotations and attitude shifts to achieve her main goals of expressing the importance of education to women in history. This poem, with its powerful statements and shocking imagery, is one of the most strongest feminist poem ever written.

The Merchant Of Venice And Henry V Essays - Shakespearean Comedies

The Merchant Of Venice And Henry V Kelley Vickers-Sullivan Engl. 141-Mid-Term Essay March 30, 2000 You've Come a Long Way Baby! Shakespeare's presentation and portrayal of his female characters in The Merchant of Venice and Henry V follows a typical pattern that is present in all of the Shakespearean plays that I have read so far. When looking closely at the fate of his female characters, this pattern becomes even more evident for it repeats itself no matter how different the plays are. For instance, Henry V and The Merchant of Venice are different in every respect. The female characters not only come from different backgrounds, they also have very different personalities. However, as different as these plays and their characters are, the female characters end up suffering the same fate. It doesn't seem to matter whether they are born into a life of peasantry, nobility, or come from royalty, for they ultimately will end up being no better than a piece of land, or cattle, or some possession that a man can own and do with as he pleases. Scholars have been debating for centuries now as to whether Shakespeare's w omen reflect his society's attitudes or that of his own. Henry V is definitely geared more for the male audience. There are only two or three acts in which a female character is present at all. When we first get a glimpse of Katherine, she is trying to learn the English language. This scene is supposed to be somewhat comical, but are we really supposed to believe that while there is a war raging throughout her country, that all Katherine is concerned about is the fact that she can't speak the language of her enemy? This scene in which we get our first glimpse of Katherine is somewhat degrading to her character as well as misleading. This leaves the audience with the inaccurate perception that Katherine, and thus all women in general, care very little about what's going on around them, and more about making themselves presentable. Afterall, isn't Katherine the ?Grand Prize? that will be awarded to the winning side? I find it very insulting that Shakespeare's only significant female role in the whole play, is being used as a ? Prize? to be given away. Shakespeare doesn't even try to hide the fact that he is setting Katherine up as a prize. I find this kind of arrogance to be offensive and very belittling to women. While the men are off fighting the battle, Katherine, the future Queen of France, does not appear to be a bit concerned over the fate of her own country. Instead, she readily accepts her fate as she prepares herself for the role of Queen of England. This play is very biased and one-sided. Most of the English men are portrayed as noble, humble and superior to the French. Henry himself can do no wrong, and is portrayed through out the play as the best leader that the English have ever had. This image that he can do no wrong and is as close to being perfect as one can get, only holds up if you don't go digging around in Henry's past, in which he had been portrayed as a spoiled, pampered partying boy. The French, in contrast to the English, are presented as arrogant, incompetent, and weak, very similar to what Henry had been not to long ago. There is, however, one thing lower than a Frenchman, and that is, a French woman. The fact that Shakespeare subjected Katherine's character, (she, who had been born into royalty which was the highest social position one can reach), to being treated as a possession or prize for a man, only adds credence to the argument that Shakespeare had very little respect for women. Katherine character, for the most part, adds very little, if anything at all, to the play. In fact, the role of Katherine could have easily been omitted altogether, and personally, I wish it had been The last act, in which Henry easily manages to win the affections of Katherine, is a weak attempt on Shakespeare's part to end the play on a an uplifting note. It's a shame that Shakespeare put it in at all because it